Icon vs Dub: How Much Load Is Too Much?
Both are two-piece composite USSSA bats with verified sizes in -10, -8 and -5. Both are recorded as carrying mass toward the end of the barrel; the difference is degree.
Reviewed 2026-09-03. Verified catalog facts only — no prices, ratings or availability.
Which one for which player
The Icon is the step; the Dub is the commitment. If the athlete is curious about more mass but has never swung a loaded bat, the Icon is the sane first move. Move to the Dub only when a loaded bat is already working.
Side by side
| Rawlings Icon | Easton Dub | |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Certification | USSSA (1.15 BPF) | USSSA (1.15 BPF) |
| Construction | Two-piece composite | Two-piece composite |
| Swing feel | Slight end-load | End-loaded (power load) |
| Verified lanes | -10 27" – 31" · -8 29" – 32" · -5 30" – 32" | -10 27" – 31" · -8 29" – 32" · -5 30" – 32" |
Choose the Icon if…
- First move away from a light, balanced bat
- Timing is good but not bulletproof
- You want more barrel feel without changing the swing
Choose the Dub if…
- A loaded bat is already comfortable
- Clear strength advantage and early barrel arrival
- Power is the athlete's actual profile, not an aspiration
What this comparison cannot tell you
The Icon's load is recorded at family level and the Dub's per drop, so we can be more precise about the Dub's orientation than the Icon's.
Neither bat is a substitute for the right size. A correctly sized bat in the “wrong” model beats an incorrectly sized bat in the right one every time, and USSSA age-group drop rules decide what is even legal for your division.
Let the fit decide, not the label
Answer a few questions and we will give you the exact length, weight and drop for your athlete, then show which verified bats — including these two — are actually built at that size.
Get My Bat Recommendation